ReviewPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Targeted Alpha Therapy as a Multiscale Design Problem: From Radioactive Decay to Therapeutic Outcome.
Review in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Targeted Alpha Therapy (TAT) is often defined by the favorable physical properties of alpha particles, particularly their high linear energy transfer and short tissue range. However, these properties alone do not determine therapeutic success. The clinical behavior of alpha-emitting radiopharmaceuticals depends on whether radioactive decay can be matched to an appropriate biological scale and maintained within a chemically and pharmacokinetically coherent system. This review presents TAT as a multiscale design problem in which radionuclide production, radioactive decay, recoil, coordination chemistry, vector compatibility, tissue geometry, microdosimetry, biodistribution, and clinical outcome are interdependent rather than separate considerations. Established and emerging alpha emitters, including radium-223, astatine-211, lead-212/bismuth-212, actinium-225/bismuth-213, thorium-227 and terbium-149, are examined as distinct design solutions rather than interchangeable therapeutic options. Their comparison shows that no single radionuclide is universally optimal, as each occupies a distinct position within a landscape defined by physical, chemical and biological constraints. Viewing TAT as a multiscale design problem shifts radionuclide selection from the search for a universally superior emitter toward the rational matching of radionuclide properties to therapeutic context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.