ReviewPharmaceutics2026
Buccal Insulin Delivery Systems: Formulation Approaches, Stability Constraints, and Translational Prospects.
Review in Pharmaceutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Insulin delivery via the buccal route has shown long-standing promise for diabetes therapy, but clinical translation remains limited. Most systems address only part of the delivery problem, whereas a viable product must simultaneously provide adequate insulin residence time, effective mucus and epithelial permeation, stability, dose consistency, safety, and manufacturability. This review examines the biological and formulation barriers limiting buccal insulin delivery and compares major platform types, including mucoadhesive films and patches, nanocarrier-based systems, deformable vesicles, chemistry-led permeation approaches, and device-enabled strategies. Stability, alongside limited permeability, is considered a key barrier, while aggregation and excipient-related instability remain insufficiently addressed. This review also discusses why promising preclinical findings often fail to translate, exhibiting low bioavailability, variability, safety concerns, and scale-up challenges recurring across platforms. Overall, further progress in buccal insulin delivery will depend on formulation strategies that better integrate permeation enhancement, stability preservation, and translational feasibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.