ReviewPharmaceutics2026
Food Effects, Pharmacokinetic Drug-Drug Interactions, and Clinical Optimization of Oral Anticancer Agents.
Review in Pharmaceutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Oral targeted therapies now constitute a substantial and growing proportion of anticancer drug therapy, shifting administration from the controlled intravenous setting to patient-managed oral therapy in the outpatient setting, where systemic exposure depends on factors that parenteral therapy largely bypasses. Food effects, gastric pH, first-pass metabolism, transporter activity, organ function, concomitant medications and adherence contribute to variability in exposure, and many oral anticancer agents have narrow therapeutic indices in which modest exposure changes carry clinical consequence. This review synthesizes the pharmacokinetic determinants of oral anticancer drug exposure across twenty-seven exemplar agents spanning the main mechanistic classes and translates them into actionable pharmacy practice. Its contribution is a cross-class agent-level comparison in which within-class divergences are made explicit, the integration of determinants usually reviewed separately, and an explicit statement of the evidence level behind every entry. We examine food effects, the interaction between acid-suppressive therapy and pH-dependent agents, the dominant role of cytochrome P450 3A4 and of the efflux transporters P-glycoprotein and breast cancer resistance protein, and the exposure-response relationships that motivate therapeutic drug monitoring, for which the evidence remains uneven and does not yet support routine use. We propose a structured framework for operationalizing these principles in daily practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.