ReviewPharmaceutics2026
Skin Barrier-Informed Topical and Transdermal Drug Delivery: Excipient-Driven Strategies, Vehicle Transformation, and Translational Challenges.
Review in Pharmaceutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Topical and transdermal dosage forms can localize therapy or provide controlled systemic exposure, but translation is limited by the selective stratum corneum (SC) barrier and post-application changes in formulation. Existing reviews often address individual enhancers or carriers without integrating drug properties, vehicle microstructure, post-application transformation, quality of evidence, and product development constraints. This review fills that gap by comparing passive formulations, chemical permeation enhancers, vesicular and lipid-based carriers, supersaturating systems, and physical barrier bypass technologies within a skin barrier-informed framework. Increased permeation alone does not establish translational value. Passive delivery remains most feasible for potent, moderately lipophilic small molecules. Chemical enhancers are scalable but limited by irritation and drug-dependent compatibility; nanocarriers may improve solubilization and cutaneous deposition but often lack human confirmation; and physical methods broaden delivery to macromolecules while adding device, manufacturing, usability, and regulatory burdens. Solvent evaporation, residual film composition, supersaturation, precipitation, and drug-vehicle affinity further determine the effective post-application driving force. Accordingly, we propose an evidence-ranked framework linking payload properties and target compartment to mechanism, safety, clinical readiness, and regulatory complexity. It distinguishes mechanistic promise from clinically demonstrated delivery and identifies the evidence needed to advance reproducible topical and transdermal products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.