ReviewPolymers2026
Polymer Microfiltration and Ultrafiltration Membranes Containing Inorganic Modifiers: Functional Properties and Performance-Review.
Review in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Modifying MF and UF polymer membranes with hydrophilic compounds is one of the well-known antifouling strategies, which also allows one to achieve a compromise between fluid permeability and the retention of one or another species. Hydrophilizing inorganic substances are widely used for modifying due to their enhanced chemical stability and multifunctionality. In this review, the inorganic modifiers are categorized according to their effect on organic contaminants and bacteria: (i) non-destructive (natural and synthetic aluminosilicates, phosphates and oxides of multivalent elements, particularly magnetic nanoparticles), (ii) bacteria-destructing (silver nanoparticles, advanced carbon nanomaterials, MXenes), and (iii) strongly destructive, which disrupt both bacteria and organic substances (photocatalysts). The mechanism of antibacterial activity of different modifiers is considered. The main approaches to modifying are stressed: blending polymers with preliminarily formed nanoparticles followed by membrane formation, synthesis of them inside the pores of membranes or on their surface, embedding pre-formed particles into pores, or modifying the surface with them. A comparative analysis of the functional properties and performance of pure polymer membranes and materials containing inorganic modifiers has been conducted. The attention is focused on the ability of modified membranes based on various polymers to retain both macromolecular and low-molecular-weight substances together with high fluid permeability and stability against organic contaminants and biofouling. The limitations of materials containing various types of inorganic modifiers are analyzed. Among the possible directions of further investigations, the development of a universal theoretical approach to modifying is noted; moreover, the testing of the materials has to involve the treatment of real solutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.