ArticlePolymers2026
Carbon Fiber- vs. Glass Fiber-Reinforced PA12 Under Protic Ionic Liquid Lubrication: Friction, Wear and the Limits of Reinforcement in FFF-Printed Composites.
Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fused filament fabrication (FFF) is increasingly employed for functional components subjected to sliding contact, for which friction and wear determine service life as decisively as static strength. Tribological characterization of fiber-reinforced polyamide 12 has been conducted predominantly under dry sliding, and the influence of the lubrication regime on the contrast between reinforcement types remains insufficiently established. The present study investigated carbon fiber (PA12-CF) and glass fiber (PA12-GF) reinforced polyamide 12, both processed by FFF, under dry sliding and under two protic ionic liquid lubricants, bis (2-hydroxyethyl) ammonium succinate (MSu) and bis (2-hydroxyethyl) ammonium citrate (MCi). Discs were tested against a 100Cr6 bearing steel counterface on an Anton Paar TRB3 tribometer at a fixed normal load of 20 N, with sliding speeds of 0.5, 0.75 and 1.0 m/s for 60 min each. The coefficient of friction (COF) and the contact-point temperature were recorded throughout, the specific wear rate was obtained by contact profilometry, and worn surfaces were examined by scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive X-ray analysis. MCi held the mean COF at 0.023 for both composites, against a dry mean of 0.071 across the study, whereas MSu increased the mean to 0.25 and produced the highest wear rates, concurrent with an increase in viscosity during testing. Reinforcement type governed the morphology of the worn surface consistently, yet lubricant selection proved more consequential than material selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.