ArticlePolymers2026
Development of Sustainable Hybrid Cementitious Concrete Using Rice Husk Ash, Quartz Powder, and Bentonite Clay.
Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigates the performance of hybrid cementitious concrete (HCC) made with rice husk ash (RHA), quartz powder (QP), and bentonite clay (BC). Four concrete mixes, including a control and three HCC mixes containing different proportions of RHA, QP, and BC, were prepared and tested. The properties of the developed concrete were evaluated through slump, density, compressive strength, failure pattern, split tensile strength, water absorption, X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX). The results indicated that the RHA, QP, and BC reduced workability, with a 13 to 19% reduction compared with the control mixture. Furthermore, the ternary blend HCC-R20-Q20-B20 achieved the highest 28-day compressive strength of 44.6 MPa (22.1% increase compared with the control). Similarly, the highest split tensile strength of 4.56 MPa was obtained by HCC-R30-Q20. Also, the HCC-R30-Q20 exhibited the lowest water absorption value, with a 23.1% reduction. Although the RHA, QP, and BC resulted in a slight decrease in density, all mixes remained within the normal-weight concrete range (2380 to 2408 kg/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.