ArticlePolymers2026
Drilling Damage and Dynamic Response of Carbon/Glass Hybrid Nomex Sandwich Composites.
Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Nomex honeycomb core sandwich composites are attractive for lightweight structural applications because of their high specific stiffness. However, drilling required for mechanical joining can introduce both surface and subsurface damage and may change the mechanical and dynamic response of the structure. This study examines Nomex aramid honeycomb sandwich composites with C/C/C, C/G/C, G/C/G, and G/G/G face-sheet configurations using three-point bending, drilling, image analysis, ultrasonic C-scan, and acoustic impact measurements. The C/C/C configuration reached an average bending load 36.05% higher than G/G/G and reduced the entry and exit side delamination areas by 88.91% and 78.89%, respectively. Although C/C/C produced the highest thrust forces during drilling, it also showed the smallest surface and internal damage regions, indicating that thrust force alone does not fully describe hole quality. C/G/C also exhibited less damage than G/C/G; however, these two hybrid configurations differ in both carbon/glass content and ply position, so the contribution of each factor cannot be separated independently. After drilling, the natural frequency decreased, and the damping ratio increased in all configurations. Overall, the carbon-rich face sheets provided higher bending resistance and more effectively limited drilling-induced damage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.