ArticlePolymers2026
Chemical Variability of Recycled PET Bottles Driven by Packaging Inputs and Processing History: A Marker-Based Multivariate Approach.
Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recycled polyethylene terephthalate (rPET) intended for food-contact applications contains complex mixtures of non-intentionally added substances (NIAS) originating from polymer degradation, recycling, packaging-related inputs, and external contamination. Although non-targeted analytical techniques can characterise these complex chemical fingerprints, a standardised framework for their systematic interpretation is lacking. This study introduces a literature-informed, pattern-based framework for interpreting Py-GC/MS fingerprints of commercial PET bottles. Twenty-two commercial PET beverage bottles were analysed by pyrolysis-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (Py-GC/MS), and detected compounds were organised into four diagnostic profile groups: PET transformation products (C-PET), packaging-associated compounds (E-PS/PVC/FCM), mixed-origin compounds (M-MIX), and condensed aromatic structures (A-AROM). Principal component analysis and a composite Quality Index (QI) were used to evaluate chemical variability. PET transformation products formed a consistent chemical baseline across all samples, whereas chemical variability was primarily associated with packaging-associated compounds and condensed aromatic structures. Bottles containing 100% rPET spanned the full range of chemical profiles, suggesting that the observed variability may be influenced more strongly by feedstock quality, packaging-related inputs, and processing history than by declared recycled content alone. The proposed framework enables a systematic interpretation of Py-GC/MS fingerprints through diagnostic chemical patterns rather than unique source attribution of individual compounds. The proposed framework provides a scalable methodology for comparative evaluation of recycled PET. It highlights that improving chemical quality requires controlling feedstock purity, packaging-related contamination, and processing conditions rather than relying solely on recycled content.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.