ArticlePolymers2026
Obsidian, Waste Ceramic Powder, and Recycled Concrete Powder as Alternative Aggregates in Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose-Stabilized Foamed Concrete: Mechanical, Thermal, and Durability Performance.
Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The substitution of conventional materials with alternative resources is a significant approach for enhancing the engineering performance and sustainability of foamed concrete (FC). While supplementary cementitious materials, volcanic materials, and waste-derived materials have been extensively investigated, the use of obsidian as an alternative aggregate in FC systems remains largely unexplored, and the combined, systematic comparative use of obsidian, waste ceramic powder (WCP), and recycled concrete powder (RCP) within a unified experimental framework has not been previously investigated. This paper evaluates the use of obsidian, WCP, and RCP as alternative aggregates in hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC)-stabilized FC by replacing standard sand at 25%, 50%, and 100% levels. The thermal, durability and mechanical characteristics of the mixtures were assessed through density, compressive strength (CS), ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV), water absorption (WA), elevated temperature resistance (200 °C, 400 °C, 600 °C and 800 °C), freeze-thaw performance, thermal conductivity (TC), and scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDS) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) analyses. The results showed that the 28-day CS increased from 0.545 MPa in the control mixture to a maximum value of 2.590 MPa in the obsidian-based FC. Moreover, WA decreased markedly from 117.7% to 46.9% in the obsidian-based FC. The UPV varied from 1355 to 1795 m/s due to the incorporation of RCP, WCP and obsidian at different replacement ratios in the mixture designs. The lowest TC of 0.08185 W/(m·K) was recorded in the obsidian-based FC at 50% substitution level. Under elevated-temperature exposure, the mixture with 100% obsidian replacement retained a compressive strength of 0.5936 MPa at 800 °C. To conclude, the use of obsidian, WCP and RCP as alternative aggregates in FC shows promising potential for the development of durable, thermally efficient, and sustainable lightweight construction materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.