ArticleNutrients2026
Creatine Use Among Women Across Reported Duration-of-Use Groups: A Platform-Based Cross-Sectional Survey of Supplementation Behaviors, Motivations, Knowledge, and Experiences.
Article in Nutrients, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCreatine is now discussed beyond sports performance and within women's health, cognition, fatigue, and healthy-aging contexts. However, little is known about the characteristics of women who use creatine or whether these characteristics differ across durations of use. This study characterized women reporting current or past-12-month creatine use in a large cross-sectional sample and benchmarked findings against men.
methodsIn a cross-sectional, supplement-platform convenience survey (approximately 2.0% response rate; a secondary analysis of a previously reported cohort), 2094 current or recent creatine users (1055 women, 1039 men; mean age 53 years [54.0 in women and 52.5 in men]) reported duration of use, supplementation goals, information sources, creatine knowledge alignment using a five-item battery, self-rated confidence, satisfaction, and intent to continue supplementation for another six months. Representation of women across six ordered duration bands was evaluated using an age-adjusted logistic model with duration as a categorical factor, with a Cochran-Armitage trend test reported alongside it. Among women, goals and information sources were compared across duration-of-use bands using unadjusted tests of homogeneity, and knowledge alignment was evaluated using an ordered trend test. Gender differences were estimated in age- and duration-adjusted models, pooled across duration groups, with Benjamini-Hochberg correction within domain; gender × duration interactions were tested for the goal and information-source outcomes. Self-rated confidence was modeled as a function of knowledge, gender, and their interaction.
resultsWomen comprised 50.0-63.9% of respondents across each reported duration category below three years but only 19.7% of those reporting 3+ years of use. In the primary age-adjusted analysis, gender composition differed strongly across duration categories (global
conclusionsAmong current and recent SuppCo users who responded to this survey, women showed a pattern of creatine use that differed from the historically performance-focused populations underlying much of the evidence base. Women were disproportionately represented in shorter reported duration-of-use categories, more often endorsed healthy aging and less often athletic performance, and reported different information sources than men. Lower knowledge alignment among shorter-duration women reflected greater uncertainty rather than greater endorsement of misconceptions, while women reported lower confidence than men at the highest observed knowledge levels. These findings suggest future research and education should go beyond efficacy trials in women to address who is using creatine, the outcomes they expect, where they obtain information, and how knowledge and confidence shape decision-making. Prospective studies are needed to determine what underlies the difference in women's representation across reported duration-of-use groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.