ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Phenolic Characterisation of
Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to characterize the phenolic composition of aqueous extracts obtained as by-products of hydrodistillation of orange, mandarin, and clementine peels and to evaluate the effect of enzymatic pretreatment on phenolic recovery. Different enzymatic pretreatments were applied prior to hydrodistillation, and the resulting extracts were analyzed by UPLC-MS/MS. Differences in the mass fractions of phenolic compounds were observed among pretreatments, with the magnitude of these changes depending on the citrus species and extraction conditions. Quercetin and kaempferol were the predominant phenolic compounds in all three citrus species. The highest sum of the mass fractions of quantified phenolic compounds was observed for mandarin peel following combined enzyme pretreatment in citrate buffer (19.73 µg/g) and for clementine peel following xylanase pretreatment in water (34.94 µg/g). For orange peel, the highest value was obtained following combined enzyme pretreatment in citrate buffer (10.88 µg/g), although no increase in the sum of the mass fractions of quantified phenolic compounds was observed compared with the corresponding control. Overall, the observed changes following enzymatic pretreatment were species-dependent, with the most pronounced increases in phenolic mass fractions found for mandarin and clementine peels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.