Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42796902›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Phenolic Characterisation of

Antonela Ninčević Grassino, Marija Penić, Sandra Pedisić, Sven Karlović, Maja Dent

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Antonela Ninčević GrassinoFaculty of Food Technology and Biotechnology, University of Zagreb, Pierottijeva 6, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0001-7452-3275
Marija PenićFaculty of Food Technology and Biotechnology, University of Zagreb, Pierottijeva 6, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Sandra PedisićFaculty of Food Technology and Biotechnology, University of Zagreb, Pierottijeva 6, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-5491-0128
Sven KarlovićFaculty of Food Technology and Biotechnology, University of Zagreb, Pierottijeva 6, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-6117-2063
Maja DentFaculty of Food Technology and Biotechnology, University of Zagreb, Pierottijeva 6, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-1860-1539

Funding

Ministry of Science, Education and Youth C3.2, source 581
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to characterize the phenolic composition of aqueous extracts obtained as by-products of hydrodistillation of orange, mandarin, and clementine peels and to evaluate the effect of enzymatic pretreatment on phenolic recovery. Different enzymatic pretreatments were applied prior to hydrodistillation, and the resulting extracts were analyzed by UPLC-MS/MS. Differences in the mass fractions of phenolic compounds were observed among pretreatments, with the magnitude of these changes depending on the citrus species and extraction conditions. Quercetin and kaempferol were the predominant phenolic compounds in all three citrus species. The highest sum of the mass fractions of quantified phenolic compounds was observed for mandarin peel following combined enzyme pretreatment in citrate buffer (19.73 µg/g) and for clementine peel following xylanase pretreatment in water (34.94 µg/g). For orange peel, the highest value was obtained following combined enzyme pretreatment in citrate buffer (10.88 µg/g), although no increase in the sum of the mass fractions of quantified phenolic compounds was observed compared with the corresponding control. Overall, the observed changes following enzymatic pretreatment were species-dependent, with the most pronounced increases in phenolic mass fractions found for mandarin and clementine peels.

Indexed as

aqueous extractscitrus peelenzymatic pretreatmenthydrodistillationphenolic compoundsUPLC–MS/MS

Identifiers

PMID42796902
PMCPMC13611369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.