ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Assessing the Potential of Multispectral UAV-Derived Vegetation Indices for Estimating Water Use of Taro (
Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Water availability is typically a limiting factor in rainfed sub-Saharan farming systems. Smallholder farmers in this region grow neglected and underutilized crops (NUCs) such as taro to supplement food shortages. Understanding the water use of NUCs could contribute to improving productivity. Traditional methods of monitoring actual evapotranspiration (ETa) are point-based and do not capture the variability in smallholder fields. In contrast, empirical models that use vegetation indices derived from multispectral unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have demonstrated the potential to provide reliable spatial variability of ETa. This study evaluated the viability of a VI-based empirical model to estimate the ETa of taro under different weed management practices in a smallholder farm using multispectral UAV imagery. Three treatments were tested: a consistently weeded plot, a plot that remained unweeded throughout the season, and an intermediate field that was partially managed for a short period after planting. A validated VI-based model that used the enhanced vegetation index (EVI2) as a proxy for the crop coefficient (Kc) was combined with reference evapotranspiration (ETo) to determine ETa on the three taro plots. The results demonstrated that the weeded plot used 27.0% less water, while the unweeded field used 35.5% more water than the intermediate field (representing the farmer's typical integrated weed management practices throughout the growing season). Although ETa in the unweeded plot represents combined evapotranspiration from taro, weeds, and the soil surface rather than taro water use alone, the findings support an association between reduced crop-weed competition, lower evapotranspiration, and increased taro yield. The VI-based empirical models derived from multispectral UAV imagery showed great potential for promoting water use efficiency through integrated weed management (IWM) in smallholder farms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.