ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2026
UAV Multispectral Remote Sensing for Rice Leaf Blast Severity Grading Using an Improved 1DCNN-Transformer Ensemble Model.
Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rice leaf blast can develop rapidly under field conditions, creating a need for fast, non-destructive, and spatially explicit monitoring. UAV multispectral imagery and synchronized ground disease surveys were collected from artificially induced rice leaf blast experiments conducted in 2024 and 2025. After image registration, U-Net canopy segmentation, and ROI quality screening, 1801 curated 3 × 3-pixel canopy ROIs were retained. Each ROI was represented by four reflectance bands and 10 vegetation indices selected by Pearson correlation analysis, and the resulting dataset supported model development and spatial mapping. The improved 1DCNN-Transformer branch combined multi-scale Inception convolution, SE recalibration, and Focal Loss with RF and GBDT probability fusion. In the hold-out evaluation, the model achieved an overall accuracy of 98.90% and a weighted F1-score of 98.89%. Five repetitions of five-fold grouped cross-validation were performed, with identical 14-feature vectors constrained to the same fold. RF, GBDT, and equal RF-GBDT probability fusion achieved mean accuracies of 99.63%, 99.29%, and 99.33%, respectively, supporting strong class separability after duplicate-group isolation. The resulting severity and prescription maps provide an end-to-end digital workflow from canopy extraction to spatial decision support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.