Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42796732›Full record

ReviewPathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Seeing Bacterial Persistence Through Different Experimental Lenses: How Methodology Shapes Biological Interpretation.

Karolina Stojowska-Swędrzyńska, Dorota Kuczyńska-Wiśnik, Ewa Laskowska

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Karolina Stojowska-SwędrzyńskaDepartment of General and Medical Biochemistry, Faculty of Biology, University of Gdańsk, Wita Stwosza 59, 80-308 Gdańsk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3448-7238
Dorota Kuczyńska-WiśnikDepartment of General and Medical Biochemistry, Faculty of Biology, University of Gdańsk, Wita Stwosza 59, 80-308 Gdańsk, Poland.
Ewa LaskowskaDepartment of General and Medical Biochemistry, Faculty of Biology, University of Gdańsk, Wita Stwosza 59, 80-308 Gdańsk, Poland.

Funding

National Science Centre 2021/05/X/NZ1/00334
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial persister cells are a rare subpopulation that survives antibiotic treatment without acquiring heritable resistance. Despite decades of research, concepts of bacterial persistence have evolved alongside experimental methods, yet the mechanisms underlying persistence remain debated, and different approaches often lead to seemingly conflicting conclusions. In this Review, we argue that these discrepancies arise not only from the heterogeneity of persister cells but also from differences in experimental methodology and biological context. We present persistence as a dynamic continuum extending from the physiological state preceding antibiotic exposure, through survival during treatment, recovery after antibiotic removal, and clonal expansion. We examine how experimental approaches-including CFU assays, population-based analyses, fluorescence microscopy, microfluidics, enrichment strategies, and cell sorting-interrogate different stages of this continuum, thereby addressing distinct biological questions rather than providing equivalent views of persistence. We further discuss how experimental context shapes the populations available for analysis and influences the interpretation of persistence phenotypes. Seemingly conflicting observations often arise from different experimental frameworks, each revealing a distinct aspect of bacterial persistence. Combining approaches that interrogate different stages of the continuum can strengthen persister identification and mechanistic interpretation. Recognizing these complementary perspectives is essential for accurately interpreting persistence and integrating findings across studies.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaDrug Resistance, BacterialMicrobial ViabilityHumansMicrofluidicsMicroscopy, FluorescenceAnti-Bacterial Agentsantibiotic treatmentcell sortingCFUFACSfluorescence microscopymicrofluidicspersister cellspopulation-based analysispopulation enrichmentsingle-cell analysis

Identifiers

PMID42796732
PMCPMC13610637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.