ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Porous Carbon Spheres (PCSs) as a Support for Ni Nanoparticles for Alkaline Water Electrolyzer Cathodes.
Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Porous carbon spheres (PCSs) were synthesized as a support for nickel nanoparticles (Ni NPs) to fabricate a cathode for hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) in an alkaline electrolyte. Characterization of the material revealed that both non-activated and activated PCS exhibited a porous, spherical morphology without pronounced structural confinement, while the deposited Ni NPs showed a tendency to aggregate into large clusters with an average particle size ranging from 16 nm to 22 nm, depending on the type of the PCS used (non-activated vs. activated). X-ray diffraction and Raman spectroscopy confirmed the predominantly amorphous and defect-rich nature of both pristine (PCS) and activated carbon support (PCS-ACT), providing favorable anchoring sites for metal nanoparticles. Although pristine PCS displayed a higher specific surface area than PCS-ACT (284 ± 10 vs. 143 ± 5 m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.