ReviewMicromachines2026
Microfabrication Strategies for Silicon Anodes in On-Chip and Miniaturized Batteries.
Review in Micromachines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid expansion of autonomous microsystems, implantable sensors, wireless sensor nodes, Internet-of-Things devices, distributed electronics, and heterogeneous system-on-chip platforms has intensified the demand for compact electrochemical energy-storage systems that can be integrated directly with microfabricated devices. Among the various negative electrode materials, silicon is particularly attractive for miniaturized lithium-ion batteries because of its high theoretical lithium-storage capacity, abundance, compatibility with mature semiconductor processing, and direct availability as both an active material and a structural platform. However, the practical implementation of silicon anodes in on-chip and miniaturized batteries remains difficult because lithiation-induced volume expansion, fracture, unstable solid-electrolyte interphase formation, loss of electrical contact, and process-integration constraints become more severe as the battery footprint is reduced to the microscale. In contrast to conventional slurry-cast silicon electrodes, silicon anodes for microbatteries can exploit microfabrication strategies such as thin-film deposition, photolithography, deep reactive ion etching, metal-assisted chemical etching, nanoimprint lithography, laser patterning, template-assisted growth, atomic layer deposition, and wafer-level encapsulation. These methods enable deterministic control over electrode geometry, areal loading, porosity, current-collector contact, diffusion length, mechanical compliance, interfacial chemistry, and compatibility with complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor and microelectromechanical-system platforms. This review summarizes the recent progress in microfabrication strategies for silicon anodes in on-chip and miniaturized batteries, emphasizing the relationship between the process route, electrode architecture, mechanical stability, electrochemical performance, and manufacturability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.