ArticleMicromachines2026
A Large-Aperture Variable Iris Directly Driven by a V-Shaped Mode-Coupled Ultrasonic Motor: Design, Optimization, and Experimental Validation.
Article in Micromachines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Large-aperture variable irises must provide continuous aperture regulation within a restricted axial space. This study presents a laboratory prototype of a 20-blade iris directly driven by a V-shaped mode-coupled ultrasonic motor. The iris was geometrically designed for a 5.5 mm-98 mm clear-aperture range. A wave-spring-bearing compliant preload mechanism was designed to maintain blade compression while permitting low-resistance actuating-ring rotation. Under a 3 N axial load, finite-element analysis showed that a representative three-blade overlap unit was approximately 7.6 times stiffer axially than the preload mechanism, so deformation occurred mainly in the latter. Taguchi design and multi-objective optimization produced a flexibly clamped stator with simulated working modes at 121.93 kHz and 122.10 kHz, separated by 170 Hz; the measured frequencies were 120.7 kHz and 121.5 kHz. At 121.8 kHz and 300 Vpp, the 5.74 g stator generated bidirectional maximum thrusts of 3.91 N and 4.11 N, corresponding to a maximum thrust-to-mass ratio of 716 N/kg. A separate short-cycle test yielded a minimum observed stable tangential displacement of 3.23 μm. Quantitative opening and closing tests over a local 10 mm-20 mm interval yielded mean absolute actuating-ring angle errors of 0.087° and 0.13°, respectively. Model-extrapolation tests from a 20 mm reference yielded an aperture MAE of 0.183 mm over 10 mm-80 mm, while errors of 1.7 mm and -1.2 mm were measured at the 5.5 mm and 98 mm targets. These results support the functional feasibility of the proposed direct-drive architecture and identify an increased prediction error near the travel limits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.