ArticleMicromachines2026
Predicting Impact Loads on Polymer Materials from Laser-Induced Cavitation Bubble Collapse Using Random Forest Regression.
Article in Micromachines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cavitation bubble collapse generates impact loads that can initiate surface damage and accelerate material degradation in hydraulic and fluid-handling systems. Predicting these loads remains challenging because the collapse response depends on nonlinear interactions among bubble dynamics, stand-off distance, and polymer mechanical, acoustic, and viscoelastic properties. This study developed machine-learning regression models to predict impact loads from laser-induced single-bubble collapse on polyethylene, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), polyamide, and antistatic polyethylene terephthalate (antistatic PET). Experiments were performed using a pulsed Nd:YAG laser at energies of 12.5, 25, and 50 mJ and normalized stand-off distances of γ = 1-5, producing 180 measurements. Impact loads were measured using a force-calibrated PVDF sensor with material-specific calibration equations. Bubble radius was obtained from high-speed imaging, whereas collapse time was determined from the PVDF voltage-time response. Thirteen input variables were used to train linear, ridge, LASSO, multilayer perceptron, and random forest regressors with Bayesian optimization and grouped five-fold cross-validation. Random forest regression achieved the best performance, with RMSE=0.6820N, MAE=0.5339N, R2=0.9168, and MAPE=12.44%. SHAP analysis identified collapse time, acoustic impedance, and loss modulus as dominant predictors. The model is therefore suitable for trend prediction within the tested experimental domain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.