ArticleMicromachines2026
A High-Sensitivity MEMS Pressure Sensor with a Narrow Cross-Beam Membrane-Short Beam Structure.
Article in Micromachines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To address the difficulty of balancing sensitivity and nonlinearity in MEMS piezoresistive pressure sensors, this study proposes an MEMS piezoresistive pressure sensor with a narrow cross-beam membrane-short beam structure. The structure introduces a tapered design at the ends of a conventional cross beam and incorporates short beams to enhance stress concentration in the sensitive regions, thereby improving output sensitivity while maintaining low nonlinearity. Finite-element analysis was performed to evaluate the stress distribution and deflection characteristics and to compare the proposed structure with conventional cross-beam and other diaphragm structures. Under identical overall dimensions, the proposed structure improves sensitivity by 61% relative to the conventional cross beam. Based on the finite-element results, multivariate fitting models for surface stress and deflection were established, and nonlinear optimization was used to determine the constrained optimal geometrical parameters within the validated design domain. Simulation results indicate that, over a pressure range of 0-1 kPa, the proposed sensor achieves a sensitivity of 12.23 mV/V/kPa and a maximum nonlinearity of 0.196% FSS, demonstrating favorable performance for micropressure detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.