ArticleMicromachines2026
Bonding with a Benchtop UV Ozone Cleaner: A Practical Guide to Prepare a Microfluidic Chip.
Article in Micromachines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study describes a procedure for preparing microfluidic chips made from polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) layers. It uses an Ossila UV ozone cleaner for surface activation instead of the more common oxygen plasma treatment. The process is limited to PDMS@PDMS bonding, and it can be used when a low-cost procedure for a small number of microfluidic chips is required or when an oxygen plasma etcher is unavailable. The challenges of this process arise from the slight hardening of the PDMS surface when it is activated for at least 70 min, which is necessary for reliable bonding. Activation of the surface is confirmed by contact angle measurements. In a static simulation and lab tests, it is demonstrated that damage resulting from this hardening in conjunction with careless handling of the microfluidic chip is mitigated by incorporating predetermined break structures and using tubes with an outer diameter that is smaller than the inlets. Additionally, pre-polymerized PDMS glue and PDMS seals are suggested to ensure that the tubes are properly sealed. A burst test in air was performed to demonstrate the stability of the bonding and gluing. IR and XPS measurements were performed to investigate surface and bulk changes due to the treatment. To demonstrate the concept, six microfluidic chips were prepared and tested, achieving flow rates of at least 170 µL/min at ±180 mbar. Bonding remains stable up to a pressure of approximately 428 ± 60 mbar.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.