ReviewMicromachines2026
Frontier Advances in Wind-Driven Triboelectric Nanogenerators for Realistic Wind Environments: Scenario-Oriented Architecture Design, System Integration, and Critical Assessment.
Review in Micromachines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Triboelectric nanogenerators (TENGs) offer promising opportunities for distributed wind energy harvesting owing to their low-speed responsiveness, structural flexibility, and adaptability to non-stationary airflow. This review examines wind-driven TENGs from the perspective of realistic wind-field constraints, focusing on three representative scenarios: urban micro-winds, offshore wind-wave environments, and low-altitude complex flows. Scenario-specific advances in device architectures, materials and interfaces, environmental protection, power management, and system integration are systematically reviewed. Representative devices are further quantitatively compared in terms of wind-speed range, activation threshold, electrical output, power density, durability, and system-level energy delivery. Particular attention is given to inconsistent definitions of cut-in wind speed, output normalization, electrical loading, and validation conditions that limit cross-study comparison. Field-validation evidence is assessed from controlled laboratory tests to long-term field operation. Key challenges involving usable regulated energy, environmental reliability, lifetime prediction, array scaling, sustainability, and deployment economics are critically discussed. Finally, five grand challenges with actionable milestones are proposed to facilitate the transition of wind-driven TENGs from laboratory prototypes toward deployable distributed micro-energy systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.