ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Medical Therapies Beyond Infliximab for Perianal Fistulizing Crohn's Disease: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease (pfCD) represents one of the most challenging manifestations. Optimal management requires a multidisciplinary approach combining surgical drainage, appropriate imaging, and advanced medical therapies. While infliximab remains the first-line medical therapy, primary non-response or secondary loss of response occurs in many patients, which highlights the need for effective alternative treatments. This narrative review summarizes the current evidence regarding medical therapies beyond infliximab, including biologics, small molecules, and emerging therapeutic strategies. A literature search of PubMed, Embase, and Scopus was conducted up to February 2026 to identify studies evaluating medical treatments of pfCD. Current evidence suggests that ustekinumab and upadacitinib remain effective following anti-TNF failure, while vedolizumab demonstrates limited efficacy. Evidence supporting IL-23 inhibitors, including risankizumab and guselkumab, is limited but rapidly evolving, with ongoing prospective trials expected to clarify their role. Novel approaches such as advanced dual-targeted therapy, subcutaneous infliximab optimization, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, and exclusive enteral nutrition have also shown encouraging preliminary results in selected patients. However, most available data derive from post hoc analyses, retrospective cohorts, or small prospective studies, with considerable heterogeneity in outcome definitions and limited incorporation of standardized radiological endpoints. Future adequately powered randomized controlled trials using harmonized clinical and magnetic resonance imaging -based outcomes are essential to establish optimal treatment sequencing and improve long-term fistula healing. Until then, individualized multidisciplinary management remains fundamental to optimizing outcomes in patients with pfCD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.