ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Management of Anticoagulation in Athletes.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) in athletes presents a unique clinical challenge that contradicts the traditional perception of athletes as low-risk individuals. While regular exercise mitigates cardiovascular risk and improves venous flow through frequent mobilization, injuries, inappropriate mechanics of participation, comorbid medical conditions, recreational utilization of performance-enhancing medication, and underlying thrombophilia all create unique circumstances for thrombosis in this patient population. Individual consideration of anticoagulant agent use, duration of treatment, and pauses in treatment depend on underlying bleeding and thrombosis risk and level of activity and lifestyle for each patient. Continuation of anticoagulation after return to participation in sports also requires thorough risk-benefit assessment factoring in overall health, and hinges partially on the ability to reverse the effect of anticoagulation in dire situations. Guidance about continuation of a particular sport if long-term anticoagulation is needed depends on shared decision-making about morbidity and quality of life. Adjunct methods to prevent further thrombosis and manage post-thrombotic syndrome are also important for athletic longevity. There is a growing body of literature regarding evaluation and management of athletes with thrombosis, and the authors aim to summarize recommendations as they apply to pediatric and adult athletes. However, it is noted that continued study of this topic is needed to create more generalized recommendations rather than considerations for individual patient management, as discussed within this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.