ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Optimizing Diagnosis in Prostate Cancer-A Narrative Review.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being investigated in prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis and characterization, offering novel approaches to improve detection and risk stratification. This narrative review summarizes current evidence regarding the application of AI across the major stages of PCa management, with particular emphasis on radiomics and pathomics. Radiomics enables the extraction of high-dimensional quantitative features from medical imaging modalities, including ultrasound, computed tomography, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), and prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA PET), providing imaging biomarkers that extend beyond conventional visual interpretation. Numerous studies have demonstrated that AI-based radiomic models improve the detection of clinically significant PCa, characterize tumor aggressiveness, predict extracapsular extension, and support individualized treatment selection. Among available imaging modalities, mpMRI remains the cornerstone for radiomics owing to its superior soft-tissue characterization, whereas PSMA PET radiomics has shown particular promise for assessing biologically aggressive disease and metastatic spread. Pathomics has further expanded the role of AI by enabling automated tumor detection, grading, quantification, and identification of adverse pathological features, with promising performance reported in selected retrospective validation studies. Despite encouraging results, widespread clinical implementation remains limited by heterogeneous imaging protocols, variability in data acquisition and annotation, lack of standardized workflows, insufficient prospective multicenter validation, and ethical and regulatory challenges. The aim of this review was to summarize current evidence on AI-based imaging analysis, radiomics, and pathomics for PCa detection, characterization, risk stratification, and pathological assessment, while highlighting the methodological challenges that currently limit clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.