ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Artificial Intelligence in Pancreatic Endoscopic Ultrasonography: From Image-Based Diagnosis to Cytopathology.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is receiving increasing attention, particularly in the field of pancreatic diseases, where early and accurate diagnosis remains a major clinical challenge. This narrative review focuses on current and emerging applications of AI in pancreatic EUS, covering both image-based diagnostic support and the analysis of samples obtained through EUS-guided tissue acquisition. The first part of the review discusses how AI is being applied to improve EUS image interpretation, ranging from lesion detection to characterization and differentiation between benign and malignant pancreatic findings. The review also discusses early evidence and future perspectives for real-time procedural support, where diagnostic performance remains highly operator-dependent. The second part explores a less frequently discussed but equally relevant area: the use of AI in the analysis of cytological specimens obtained through EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration or fine-needle biopsy. Although cytopathology may appear to lie outside the traditional clinical scope of EUS, it represents an essential step in the diagnostic workflow of pancreatic diseases. Recent developments in AI-assisted digital cytology and pathology have shown promising potential to support and standardize cytological interpretation, with possible benefits in terms of diagnostic consistency, reproducibility, and turnaround time. By bridging imaging and pathology, AI may enhance the entire pancreatic EUS workflow, contributing to more efficient, accurate, and personalized diagnostic pathways in pancreatic disease management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.