ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Athletes with Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators: A Practical Framework for Device Selection, Programming, and Return-to-Sport Risk Mitigation.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) were historically viewed as a barrier to vigorous or competitive sport participation, based on theoretical concerns about arrhythmia induction, inappropriate shocks, device damage, and shock-related injury during activity. Contemporary registry data have reframed this paradigm, demonstrating that selected athletes with ICDs can participate in organized sport without the catastrophic outcomes once feared, although these data remain reassuring rather than definitive given selection bias and underrepresentation of high-consequence sports. This review synthesizes contemporary athlete-specific registry data and broader randomized device and programming evidence, alongside current guideline recommendations, to provide a practical framework for the care of athletes with ICDs, addressing indications, which should remain diagnosis-driven rather than sport-driven; device selection, weighing transvenous, subcutaneous, and extravascular platforms against an athlete's pacing needs, anatomy, and sport-specific trauma risk; and exercise-informed device programming. We then present a longitudinal framework integrating clinical readiness, device readiness, sport-specific risk, emergency preparedness, shared decision-making, and reassessment after clinical or sporting changes. Special populations and priorities for future research are also discussed. Rather than a binary clearance decision, modern management of athletes with ICDs requires an individualized, longitudinally reassessed approach to risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.