ArticleMicroorganisms2026
Integrating Microbial Indicators from High-Throughput Sequencing into Soil Quality Index: A Case Study in a Restored Mining Area.
Article in Microorganisms, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Soil Quality Index (SQI) is a vital tool for evaluating soil quality; however, traditional approaches seldom integrate microbial data from high-throughput sequencing-commonly used to characterize soil microbial communities-into the SQI framework. This study enhances the SQI by incorporating microbial indicators derived from high-throughput sequencing, establishing a more comprehensive evaluation system. We collected soil samples from mining areas and analyzed their fundamental physicochemical properties and microbial indicators. Four SQI models were constructed using different indicator sets: (1) only physicochemical properties (T-SQI); (2) physicochemical properties and bacterial α-diversity (α-SQI); (3) physicochemical properties, α-diversity, and relative abundances of the top five abundant bacteria (αMA-SQI); and (4) physicochemical properties, α-diversity, and relative abundances of the top five bacteria based on LDA scores (αBM-SQI). Results demonstrated that integrating multi-level microbial indicators improved the rationality of soil quality rankings and significantly strengthened correlations with α-diversity. Gemmatimonadota was consistently selected in the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for both αMA-SQI and αBM-SQI, highlighting its ecological importance. Statistically, microbial indicators at the order and family levels were most suitable for inclusion in the MDS, as their results deviated least from the total dataset. In conclusion, incorporating microbial diversity across taxonomic levels refines the SQI, enabling a more accurate and holistic assessment of soil health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.