ReviewMicroorganisms2026
Metabolite-Resolved Validation of Bacterial Organophosphate Transformation in Soil: A Critical Review of Selected Organophosphate Case Studies.
Review in Microorganisms, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This structured critical narrative review evaluates the bacterial transformation of six selected organophosphate pesticides-chlorpyrifos, methyl parathion, parathion, diazinon, malathion, and phosalone-in relation to chemical, mechanistic, and environmental evidence. Peer-reviewed literature was searched in Scopus and PubMed for the period from 1 January 2020 to 26 August 2026 and was supplemented by backward-reference screening and forward citation tracking of foundational studies. Evidence was assessed across eight domains spanning association, tolerance, controlled dissipation, product-resolved transformation, mechanistic attribution, non-sterile-soil validation, detoxification or ecological recovery, and field readiness. The selected compounds reveal substantial differences in pathway resolution: chlorpyrifos has the most developed parent-product evidence base, methyl parathion and parathion are comparatively well characterized at the hydrolytic and enzyme levels, diazinon and malathion retain important downstream uncertainties, and phosalone remains an unresolved evidence-gap comparator. The synthesis shows that credible soil bioremediation requires convergence among parent-product kinetics, catalytic attribution, transformation-product turnover, performance beyond natural attenuation, toxicity reduction, and recovery of relevant soil or plant functions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.