ArticleMicroorganisms2026
Microbes Drive Straw Decomposition and Microbial Metabolism in Mollisols with Different Straw Return Rates.
Article in Microorganisms, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The process of straw decomposition is highly complex and is regulated by a multitude of interacting factors. However, how the straw return rate influences the metabolic byproducts, extracellular enzymes, and microbial communities during straw decomposition remains an unresolved question. To address this, we integrated straw and soil chemistry, amplicon sequencing, untargeted metabolomics, and enzyme assays across four straw return rates (no return, 1/3, 1/2, and the Full treatment) at 30 and 90 d. Straw mass loss was greatest under the 1/2 return treatment at 90 d, reaching 53.7%, whereas soil organic carbon (SOC) and total nitrogen (N) were highest under the 1/3 return, exceeding the control by 17.6% and 17.2%, respectively. This indicates that decomposition and short-term soil C and N accumulation were decoupled. Microbial communities underwent clear temporal turnover, and hydrolytic enzymes increased from 30 to 90 d and were positively associated with mass loss. In contrast, oxidative enzymes showed no positive association with decomposition. Metabolomic profiles shifted from early-stage labile compounds to later-stage aromatic and phenolic compounds, and straw and soil metabolomes were closely coupled in a stage-specific manner (Procrustes M
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.