Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42795295›Full record

ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2026

The Ocular Signature of TBI: A Narrative Review of Structural Changes and Potential Candidate Biomarkers.

Sultan Alotaibi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sultan AlotaibiOptometry Department, College of Applied Medical Science, King Saud University, P.O. Box 10219, Riyadh 11433, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-2665-9594

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraumatic brain injury (TBI) damages brain tissues and affects the ocular system. Ocular manifestations such as orbital fractures, ocular surface disease, photosensitivity, impaired pupillary response, and retinal damage often co-occur with TBI. Despite established diagnostic criteria, a gap remains, particularly in detection, monitoring, and recovery prediction. Since ocular manifestations co-occur with TBI, they may offer non-invasive means to address this gap. Accordingly, this review evaluates whether TBI-associated ocular manifestations can serve as biomarkers for TBI detection, monitoring, and recovery.

methodsA literature search was conducted across three databases for studies that address ocular manifestations of TBI listed above.

resultsOrbital fractures occur in 69%, matching TBI severity. Occult fractures may indicate unseen mild TBI on advanced neuroimaging. Dry eye disease prevalence is inconsistent (15 and 37%). Tear film proteomics show altered inflammatory and repair proteins, though this area remains understudied. Vitreous total tau and neurofilament light chain correlate with brain levels in chronic traumatic encephalopathy. Photosensitivity affects approximately 50% of acute TBI and declines to 14% after three months. NPi-200 pupillometer shows high specificity in triaging acute injury but with low sensitivity. PLR-3000 pupillometer and smartphone applications require further validation. Retinal imaging shows biphasic thickening then progressive thinning, modulated by sex, severity and duration.

conclusionsNo single ocular biomarker fulfills all roles. Instead, different markers map into distinct stages of the clinical course. Future research should prioritize molecular markers in the tear film, combined with changes in corneal nerves across different TBI severities.

Indexed as

ocular surfaceorbital fracturesphotosensitivitypupillary responseTBI

Identifiers

PMID42795295
PMCPMC13608046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.