ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Beyond Targeted Gene Panels: Whole-Exome Sequencing as a Strategic Platform for Precision Therapeutics in Alzheimer's Disease.
Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) continues to be one of the greatest challenges in public health due to its multifactorial and heterogeneous nature, involving multiple physiological axes that encompass a large number of genetic, metabolic, vascular, and inflammatory interactions. In current clinical practice, medical specialties, mainly neurology and psychiatry, still rely on targeted gene panels for genetic evaluation. Although these panels remain effective for certain predefined hypotheses, their restricted and predefined nature limits the detection of the broader spectrum of genetic variation that may contribute to the complex biological interactions underlying neurodegeneration. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) is, from our clinic-based perspective, one of the most comprehensive genomic approaches currently available, since it allows the analysis of the ~19,500 protein-coding regions, and depending on the library approximately 5500 additional clinically relevant genomic loci, including splice sites, untranslated regions, long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), pseudogenes, regulatory elements and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA). It enables the identification of pathogenic variants and variants of uncertain significance (VUS) under the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) classification frameworks. It also expands biological interpretation to variants conventionally classified as benign, which, when interpreted collectively, may contribute to pathway-level contextualization within the hypothesis-generating theoretical framework proposed in this review without implying pathogenicity, causal inference, or immediate clinical actionability. Additionally, WES enables the identification of secondary and incidental findings that may provide clinically relevant information beyond the primary phenotype, thereby supporting preventive surveillance and clinical risk management. This review analyzes the use of WES as a strategic platform for personalized decision-making in contemporary practice given the multifactorial and heterogeneous complexity of AD. It also addresses the complexities and limitations of the ACMG/AMP recommendations for filtering and classification of variants, the lack of standardization between reports and platforms, and the need for physician training, which constitute a great challenge for the translation of data to therapeutic decision-making. While the clinical utility of whole-exome sequencing (WES) in genetic diagnosis and precision medicine is well established, this review additionally proposes a hypothesis-generating theoretical framework whereby variants conventionally classified as benign or of uncertain significance may contribute to pathway-level biological contextualization in Alzheimer's disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.