ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Motor Unit Behaviour in the Biceps Brachii During Asymmetric Bilateral Versus Unilateral Dynamic Force Tracking Across Force Levels and Rates of Force Development: A Preliminary Study.
Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Most bilateral actions in daily life are asymmetric: one limb sustains a steady postural load while the other performs a continuously adjusted force task. Whether the influence of such a sustained contraction on the contralateral limb is a fixed property of bilateral coordination or a strategy that higher centres rescale with task demand is unknown. In this exploratory study, we examined motor unit recruitment and common neural drive in the biceps brachii during asymmetric bilateral versus unilateral isometric force tracking, tested whether the interlimb effect depends on force level and rate of force development. Fifteen healthy adults tracked trapezoidal force profiles with the right biceps brachii at two force levels (10% and 30% of maximal voluntary contraction) and three rates of force development (5%, 10%, and 20% per second), performed unilaterally and bilaterally while the left biceps brachii held a constant 20% contraction. High-density surface electromyography was decomposed into individual motor units. Relative to unilateral tracking, the bilateral condition tended to raise recruitment threshold, lowered steady-state discharge rate, increased common-input variability, and reduced force stability, whereas action-potential amplitude and the variance explained by the common input (41-45%) were unchanged. No force- or rate-dependent interactions emerged. Although consistent with a spinal constraint, these findings cannot exclude cortical strategies and should be interpreted cautiously given the small sample.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.