ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Experimental Investigations on the Flexural Responses of Reinforced Rubberized Concrete Beams with High Rubber Contents and Longitudinal Reinforcement Ratios.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The accumulation of end-of-life tyres represents a growing environmental burden, motivating the incorporation of tyre rubber as a partial aggregate replacement in concrete. However, the flexural performance of reinforced rubberized concrete (RuC) beams at high rubber contents and elevated longitudinal reinforcement ratios remains insufficiently investigated. This study experimentally examined the flexural behaviour of RC beams cast with conventional concrete and RuC incorporating 40% and 60% replacement of small coarse aggregate by volume, at longitudinal reinforcement ratios of 1.5% and 2.0%, approaching the over-reinforced range. Eighteen beams were tested under four-point bending until failure by concrete crushing, with deflection, crack development, and material properties monitored throughout. Rubber incorporation reduced the modulus of elasticity and compressive strength, corresponding to a Eurocode 2 class downgrade from C45/55 to C35/40, while increasing peak axial strain. At 1.5% reinforcement, increasing rubber content progressively enhanced deflection capacity and ductility, with RuC60 beams reaching a ductility coefficient of 2.52 versus 2.43 for conventional beams. At 2.0% reinforcement, this benefit was suppressed, with ductility converging to 1.40-1.47 across all mixes as compression zone crushing increasingly governed failure. These findings indicate that the structural benefits of high-rubber-content RuC are most pronounced in moderately reinforced beams and diminish as sections approach the over-reinforced regime, informing the applicability envelope of RuC for load-bearing flexural elements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.