ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Ex-Situ and In-Situ Hybrid Processing Opportunities in Metal Additive Manufacturing.
Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Metal additive manufacturing (AM) enables near-net-shape fabrication of complex components, but process-induced defects and heterogeneities continue to limit performance and broader adoption. This review examines ex-situ and in-situ hybrid processing across multiple AM processes and alloy systems, including heat treatment, deformation-based processing, hot isostatic pressing, machining, friction stir processing, ultrasonic and magnetic-field assistance, alloying, stirring, and surface preparation. Ex-situ routes modify the completed build through bulk densification, homogenization, phase control, and surface improvement, whereas in-situ routes modify defects, microstructure, residual stress, and phase evolution during fabrication by interacting with the liquid melt pool, viscoplastic material, or solidified layer(s). The in-situ hybrid processing literature is dominated by wire-based directed energy deposition (DED) because its open architecture facilitates secondary-tool integration. Deformation-based methods were the most common and frequently promoted pore closure, recrystallization, texture modification, residual-stress redistribution, and improved mechanical performance. Hybrid processing was most effective when integrated to target the dominant material-specific limitation. Aluminum alloys benefited primarily from porosity control, stainless steels from grain and texture modification, titanium alloys from prior-β and α/β morphology control, nickel-based superalloys from segregation and Laves-phase mitigation, and steels from control of transformation microstructures. This material-state-aware framework may also extend to polymers and composites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.