ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Raw Marine Sediments in Concrete: Mechanical Performance, Durability, Environmental Release, and End-of-Life Behavior.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The valorization of raw dredged sediments in concrete requires simultaneous verification of engineering performance and environmental safety during both service life and end-of-life conditions. This work focuses on raw marine sediment collected from a port area as a partial substitute for natural sand, through a global assessment of physical properties, mechanical performance, durability, simulated-rainfall release, and leaching after crushing. Four concretes with 0, 10, 20, and 30% of sediment, with the same contents of cement and effective water, and targeting the same SF2 consistency class, were manufactured. Increasing the replacement rate increased porosity, water absorption, shrinkage, and carbonation depth, while lowering the compressive strength. At 28 days, the compressive strength dropped from 43.91 MPa for the reference to 38.16 MPa at the 20% replacement and 24.63 MPa at the 30% replacement. The apparent chloride migration coefficient decreased by about 31 and 77% for the two replacement rates, respectively; given the initial chloride content of the sediment, this trend is interpreted comparatively and possible mechanisms are discussed cautiously. In the simulated-rainfall test, releases of anions, trace metals, and organic indicators measured from the intact concrete remained below the adopted screening thresholds; however, because only one slab per formulation was tested, these environmental observations are preliminary. After crushing, some sediment-containing mixtures exceeded inert-waste thresholds for chlorides, fluorides, or nickel, showing that stabilization was incomplete under end-of-life conditions. Among the sediment-containing mixtures tested, the 20% replacement provided the best overall balance between natural-resource substitution, technical performance, and the preliminary environmental observations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.