ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Design- and Voxel-Based Analysis of a Topology-Density Dual-Gradient TPMS Absorber for Impact-Load Mitigation.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS) lattices are promising lightweight impact absorbers, but high-fidelity finite element modeling is costly, and uniform designs can develop high stress peaks during densification. This study presents a voxel-based finite element framework and a topology-density dual-gradient (TDDG) TPMS absorber. A convergence study selected a voxel size of 0.33 mm, yielding a 1.11% relative-density error and converged mechanical responses. Compared with a converged C3D4 tetrahedral model, the C3D8R voxel model reduced wall-clock time from 4222 to 497 s. Following validation against quasi-static compression tests, P, G, and IWP topologies at 20%, 30%, and 40% relative densities were screened. IWP20 and P40 were assigned to the impact- and support-facing regions and connected by normalized sigmoid interpolation. Under a 125 J impact, simulations predicted that TDDG-IWP20-P40 reduced peak nominal impact stress by 32.2% and 24.6% relative to U-P30 and DG-P20-P40, respectively, while maintaining comparable SEA. Additional simulations at 62.5 and 160 J confirmed lower peak stress than U-P30, with the added benefit over density-only grading becoming more pronounced at higher impact energy. Progressive crushing and delayed densification demonstrate the potential of TDDG TPMS absorbers for impact-load mitigation and future aerospace buffer designs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.