ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Reactivity Assessment of Diverse Aluminosilicate Wastes in Metakaolin-Based Alkali-Activated Binders.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The development of carbon-neutral construction materials has stimulated interest in alkali-activated systems for the valorization of industrial non-hazardous waste. This study proposes an original comparative approach to assess the cementing reactivity of several wastes, including black and white fly ash, bottom ash, fine glass dust, and float-glass polishing sludge, through their use as partial replacements for metakaolin (MK). Formulations containing 5-50 wt% of fine waste powders (<45 μm) were prepared and mechanically compared with a reference MK-based geopolymer. Formulations containing waste additions to the reference geopolymeric paste were also evaluated to investigate their role as aggregates/fillers. Mechanical testing identified float-glass polishing sludge as the most reactive precursor, achieving a compressive strength of 25 MPa at 10 w% addition, compared with 16 MPa for the reference material. Bottom ash and black and white fly ash reached approximately 19-21 MPa at 5-10% replacement or addition. Conversely, bottom ash at substitution levels above 5% reduced mechanical performance owing to its high crystallinity and unfavorable Si/Al molar ratio. Microstructural characterization by XRD, FT-IR, density measurements, and SEM was correlated with the observed cementing activity. These results provide a basis for performance-based design criteria aimed at the sustainable valorization of locally available industrial by-products in alkali-activated materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.