ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Low-Carbon, Recycled Powder-Based Binder: Engineering Properties, Carbon Sequestration Potential, and Recycling.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To improve the high-value utilization of recycled concrete powder (RCP) and its carbon sequestration potential, this study developed a low-carbon recycled powder-based binder (LCRPB) incorporating RCP, silica fume (SF), granulated blast-furnace slag (GBFS), and fly ash (FA). A five-factor, five-level orthogonal design was used to evaluate workability, mechanical properties, hydration behavior, wet carbonation performance, and post-carbonation reusability. The water-to-binder ratio showed the greatest relative influence on flowability and compressive strength, whereas RCP content had a greater influence on 28-day flexural strength and wet carbonation behavior. At favorable dosage levels, 2% SF, 7.5% GBFS, and 10% FA increased the 28-day compressive strength by 17.43%, 12.43%, and 11.83%, respectively. Wet carbonation showed the highest efficiency at a liquid-to-solid ratio of 5 and a CO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.