ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Clear Aligners as a Prescribed Source of Unmeasured Intra-Oral Micro- and Nanoplastic Exposure: Release Mechanisms, Human Evidence, Salivary Biomonitoring and the EU Regulatory Context.
Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clear orthodontic aligners are removable polymer devices worn about 22 h a day for 12 to 24 months, increasingly by children. A growing in vitro literature shows that thermoformed and 3D-printed aligners shed micro- and nanoplastics and co-release elemental or organic constituents under oral, gastric and mechanical conditions, yet aligner-derived particle burden and systemic dose in wearers have not been measured. This review sets aligner-derived release against the wider human micro- and nanoplastic record and evaluates saliva as a biomonitoring matrix. Directly printed devices release more and larger microplastics under mechanical stress, whereas thermoformed materials show acid-related degradation, with Sb/Sn release and nanometre-scale particles reported in a single, not yet replicated in vitro study. Particles below 5 microns, especially below 1 micron, are plausible translocation candidates, but translocation of aligner-derived particles has not been demonstrated. In vitro work reports macrophage and oxidative responses, whereas detections in blood, placenta and atheroma are not source-specific and remain associative. The EU amalgam phase-out does not regulate aligners but highlights a substitution question, because device and chemicals law addresses intentionally added microplastics, not wear-generated secondary particles. ICP-MS for antimony and tin, with Raman, micro-FTIR and electron microscopy, forms a plausible analytical toolbox. We propose harmonised release testing and validated salivary biomonitoring, prioritising children, to characterise source-proximal exposure before use expands.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.