ReviewCancers2026
Circulating Tumor DNA-Based Molecular Residual Disease in Early-Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Biology, Assays, and the Path Toward MRD-Guided Care.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Complete surgical resection remains the cornerstone of curative therapy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), yet a substantial proportion of patients relapse despite a macroscopically complete operation and negative conventional staging. This residual risk reflects micrometastatic disease that is below the resolution of computed tomography and that current clinicopathologic risk factors only coarsely predict. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) provides a direct, blood-based readout of this molecular residual disease (MRD), its detection after definitive treatment is among the strongest known predictors of recurrence, and ctDNA frequently rises months before radiographic progression. In this narrative review, based on a literature search closed on 12 September 2026, we synthesize the foundational and translational literature underpinning ctDNA-MRD in resected NSCLC. We outline the biology of ctDNA shedding and metastatic dissemination established by serial-sampling and phylogenetic studies; the prognostic performance of landmark and longitudinal MRD, tabulated quantitatively across the major cohorts, meta-analyses and trial-nested analyses; the perioperative kinetics that dictate when sampling is informative; the analytical design of tumor-informed versus tumor-agnostic assays and the determinants of their sensitivity; and the biological and technical sources of false-negative and false-positive results, of which clonal hematopoiesis and low-shedding histologies are the most consequential. We then position MRD within the contemporary perioperative treatment landscape-adjuvant targeted therapy and immunotherapy, and neoadjuvant and perioperative chemoimmunotherapy-and review the emerging, still-investigational paradigm of MRD-guided escalation and de-escalation, including the early termination of the MRD-selected MERMAID trials. We conclude with the analytical, evidentiary and implementation barriers-and the current positions of guideline bodies and regulators-that separate a powerful prognostic biomarker from a validated predictive tool, and we set out the trial-design requirements needed to close that gap.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.