ReviewCancers2026
Erythropoietin in Tumor Immunity: Mechanistic Evidence, Clinical Cautions, and Translational Opportunities.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Erythropoietin (EPO) is a hypoxia-responsive glycoprotein hormone that sustains erythroid progenitor survival through the erythropoietin receptor (EPOR). Beyond erythropoiesis, emerging evidence places the EPO/EPOR axis at the interface of tumor adaptation, stromal remodeling, and immune tolerance. Interpretation has been complicated by nonspecific antibodies, low receptor abundance, and failure to distinguish EPOR transcripts or intracellular proteins from ligand-accessible, functional cell-surface receptors. Recent mechanistic studies have established immunoregulatory roles: tumor-derived EPO reprograms EPOR-positive macrophages through nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2)-dependent heme depletion, whereas EPOR signaling in conventional type 1 dendritic cells promotes tolerance and restrains antitumor T-cell priming. EPO-driven expansion of CD71-positive nucleated erythroid cells provides an additional systemic suppressive route. Evidence for direct effects on tumor cell survival, angiogenesis, and treatment resistance is more heterogeneous and must be interpreted in light of receptor validation, model context, and exposure conditions. This critical narrative review introduces operational evidence categories, distinguishes exploratory tissue screening from causal validation, and proposes a scalable experimental framework with minimum, enhanced, and gold-standard levels. Clinically, erythropoiesis-stimulating agents remain supportive care agents, not anticancer therapies; their use is restricted by thromboembolic risk and historical survival concerns. Translational development should prioritize practical biomarker panels and tumor- or cell-selective interventions that preserve erythropoietic safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.