ArticleCancers2026
Machine Learning-Based Investigation of Factors Influencing Recurrence of Colorectal Adenomatous Polyps: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesColorectal adenomatous polyps are well-recognized precancerous lesions of colorectal cancer. Patients who undergo endoscopic polypectomy still face a high risk of polyp recurrence, and individualized risk stratification remains challenging in routine clinical practice. Dyslipidemia has been implicated in adenoma development, but its role in recurrence and the predictive value of machine learning tools are understudied in Chinese populations. This study aimed to identify independent risk factors for adenoma recurrence and compare the performance of eight machine learning prediction models.
methodsThis single-center retrospective cohort study included 769 patients who underwent colonoscopic polypectomy and completed at least one surveillance colonoscopy. A non-random site-based split was used to derive a training cohort (
resultsAbnormal high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), higher baseline polyp count, and larger total polyp volume were independent risk factors for adenoma recurrence. In the training set, the gradient boosting machine (GBM) achieved the highest AUC of 0.874, followed by XGBoost (AUC = 0.866); in the test set, GBM and XGBoost maintained favorable discriminative performance with AUCs of 0.863 and 0.849, respectively. The two models delivered comparable clinical net benefit across clinically relevant probability thresholds. XGBoost demonstrated acceptable calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow
conclusionsAbnormal HDL-C and greater baseline polyp burden are independent predictors of earlier colorectal adenoma recurrence. Machine learning models, particularly gradient boosting algorithms, achieve favorable discriminative performance and may serve as complementary tools for post-polypectomy risk stratification, though further calibration optimization is warranted prior to clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.