Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42794923›Full record

ReviewCancers2026

Advances in Minimally Invasive Surgery for Biliary Tract Cancer from the Viewpoint of Liver Surgery: A Task-Based Framework for Disease-Specific Procedures.

Zenichi Morise, Hiroyuki Kato, Akihiko Horiguchi, Hidetoshi Katsuno

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zenichi MoriseDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Bantane Hospital, 3-6-10 Otobashi, Nakagawa-ku, Nagoya 454-8509, Aichi, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6382-6502
Hiroyuki KatoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Bantane Hospital, 3-6-10 Otobashi, Nakagawa-ku, Nagoya 454-8509, Aichi, Japan.
Akihiko HoriguchiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Bantane Hospital, 3-6-10 Otobashi, Nakagawa-ku, Nagoya 454-8509, Aichi, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2187-1396
Hidetoshi KatsunoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Bantane Hospital, 3-6-10 Otobashi, Nakagawa-ku, Nagoya 454-8509, Aichi, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7054-7808

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biliary tract cancer (BTC) surgery often requires more than organ resection, and the role of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) cannot be adequately interpreted by disease subtype alone because operative complexity varies substantially within each subtype. This narrative review evaluates recent evidence for laparoscopic and robotic surgery in BTC from a task-based perspective, focusing on liver resection, lymphadenectomy, bile duct resection and reconstruction, vascular or multivisceral procedures, and pancreatic resection. Peripheral intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, which is often of the small-duct type, represents the most established field for minimally invasive liver resection, although lymphadenectomy remains inconsistent. Central intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, which is often of the large-duct type, should be considered separately because increasing hilar involvement may require systematic lymphadenectomy and bile duct resection and reconstruction, making the operation more similar to that for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma remains the highest-task-load frontier of BTC-MIS, typically requiring major liver resection with caudate lobectomy, bile duct resection, lymphadenectomy, and reconstruction of multiple small bile ducts. Current evidence is derived predominantly from retrospective studies of highly selected patients treated at expert centers. Gallbladder cancer should be stratified into Tis/T1a disease, T1b/T2 and selected T3 disease suitable for standard extended cholecystectomy, bile duct-involved disease, and locally advanced disease. Distal cholangiocarcinoma should be evaluated within the evidence base for minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy rather than liver surgery. Overall, current evidence most strongly supports MIS for selected patients with peripheral intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and for standard extended cholecystectomy in selected patients with gallbladder cancer. Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy may also be considered for selected patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma in experienced centers. Central intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, bile duct-involved gallbladder cancer, and locally advanced gallbladder cancer require cautious patient selection, standardized reporting, and prospective multicenter validation.

Indexed as

bile duct reconstructionbiliary tract cancerdistal cholangiocarcinomagallbladder cancerintrahepatic cholangiocarcinomalaparoscopic surgerylymphadenectomyminimally invasive surgeryperihilar cholangiocarcinomarobotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID42794923
PMCPMC13604654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.