Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42794917›Full record

ReviewCancers2026

Mechanisms of Resistance to MEK Inhibitors (RAS-MAPK Pathway) in Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors and Their Precursor Lesions (Plexiform Neurofibromas) Associated with Neurofibromatosis Type 1.

Sergey I Sologov, Diana Sologova, Denis Dubinin, George Anikin, Nana Bekhorashvili, Maria Rayisyan, Elena Krylova, Milada Yarkova, Ekaterina M Grigorevskikh, Elena Smolyarchuk and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sergey I SologovSklifosovsky Institute of Clinical Medicine, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow 119991, Russia.ORCID 0009-0001-8420-6852
Diana SologovaDepartment of Oral Surgery, Institute of Dentistry, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow 119991, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-6376-7802
Denis DubininSklifosovsky Institute of Clinical Medicine, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow 119991, Russia.
George AnikinSklifosovsky Institute of Clinical Medicine, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow 119991, Russia.
Nana BekhorashviliDepartment of Regulatory Relations in the Field of Circulation of Medicines and Medical Devices, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow 119991, Russia.
Maria RayisyanDepartment of Regulatory Relations in the Field of Circulation of Medicines and Medical Devices, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow 119991, Russia.
Elena KrylovaDepartment of Pharmacology, A.P. Nelyubin Institute of Pharmacy of Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow 119991, Russia.
Milada YarkovaDepartment of Pharmacology, A.P. Nelyubin Institute of Pharmacy of Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow 119991, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-2877-5786
Ekaterina M GrigorevskikhDepartment of Pharmacology, A.P. Nelyubin Institute of Pharmacy of Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow 119991, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-4290-4396
Elena SmolyarchukDepartment of Pharmacology, A.P. Nelyubin Institute of Pharmacy of Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow 119991, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-2615-7167
Susanna SologovaDepartment of Pharmacology, A.P. Nelyubin Institute of Pharmacy of Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow 119991, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-8526-7147

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesMEK inhibitors (selumetinib, mirdametinib) are the only approved class of targeted therapy for neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1)-associated plexiform neurofibroma (PN), producing partial responses in a substantial proportion of patients (up to 63.6% in adults; objective response rate 19.7% versus 5.4% with placebo in the KOMET trial). Responses, however, are rarely complete or durable, and in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) single-agent MEK inhibition is clinically ineffective. Mechanisms of escape from MEK inhibition in these tumors remain poorly characterized and are reported in the literature as isolated primary studies without an integrative analysis. The aim of this review was to systematize both the established molecular mechanisms of resistance to MEK inhibitors in PN and MPNST and the biologically plausible candidate mechanisms extrapolated from other RAS-driven malignancies.

methodsThis is a narrative review. A structured search was performed in PubMed, PubMed Central, NCBI Bookshelf, and Scopus, supplemented by clinical practice guidelines and regulatory documents; it covered publications up to 31 May 2026 and was updated in August 2026. Ninety-six sources are cited, and their composition by publication type is reported; record counts at the intermediate screening steps were not maintained, and no PRISMA flow diagram is presented.

resultsMechanisms were classified within a convergent framework into six categories: reactivation of MAPK signaling within the cascade; parallel (bypass) reactivation through receptor tyrosine kinases and adjacent inputs; epigenetic and transcriptional rewiring; cell survival programs; the tumor microenvironment and immune evasion; and intratumoural heterogeneity. Each mechanism was then graded along two independent axes-the strength of evidence that it confers resistance in PN or MPNST (E1-E3) and its therapeutic tractability (T1-T3)-and annotated with the entity and model constituting its evidence source.

conclusionsResistance to MEK inhibition in PN and MPNST is convergent rather than mechanism-unique. The principal limitation of the field is the near-absence of clinical resistance data from patients progressing on MEK inhibitors; prospective molecular monitoring, rational combination trials, and mechanism-stratifying biomarkers are the priorities.

Indexed as

adaptive resistancedrug resistancemalignant peripheral nerve sheath tumorMEK inhibitormirdametinibneurofibromatosis type 1plexiform neurofibromaRAS–MAPK signalingselumetinibtargeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID42794917
PMCPMC13605925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.