ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Rhenium in Wild Mushrooms: Environmental Occurrence and Censoring-Aware Quantification.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rhenium (Re) is a scarce technology-critical transition metal used in high-temperature superalloys, catalysts and other advanced materials, yet its occurrence in terrestrial biota and potential relevance to environmental exposure remains poorly characterised. This study investigated total Re in wild mushroom fruiting bodies collected from selected green spaces in Leicester and Leicestershire, United Kingdom, using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) and censoring-aware statistical analysis. The analytical dataset comprised 157 records. After exclusion of four unmatched tissue-only records, 153 analytical portions were reconstructed into 121 fruiting-body-level biological units, avoiding pseudoreplication from separately analysed cap and stem tissues. The analysis incorporated procedural digestion blanks, sample-specific dry-weight analytical limits and interval censoring. Under the primary analytical scenario, 73/121 units (60.3%) were non-detects, 21 (17.4%) were detected below the operational lower limit of quantification (LLOQ), seven (5.8%) were partially quantified and 20 (16.5%) were fully quantified. Overall, 48/121 units (39.7%) contained at least one Re signal above the operational detection threshold, whereas 27/121 (22.3%) contained at least one quantitatively valid component. Fully quantified concentrations ranged from 3.91 to 163.70 ng g
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.