ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Virtual Screening and Molecular Dynamics Simulations Identifying Natural Product-Derived Cathepsin K Inhibitors as Potential Therapeutics for Osteoporosis.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Osteoporosis is a prevalent skeletal disorder characterized by excessive bone resorption and an increased risk of fragility fracture. Cathepsin K (CatK), a lysosomal cysteine protease predominantly expressed in osteoclasts, is an established target for anti-resorptive drug development. Here, an integrated computational workflow comprising virtual screening, molecular docking, 300 ns molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, molecular mechanics/Poisson-Boltzmann surface area (MM/PBSA) calculations, and drug-likeness/ADMET prediction was used to prioritize natural product-derived CatK ligands from the MEGxM database. Among approximately 6500 screened compounds, TOP1 (PubChem ID: 97043052) and TOP2 (PubChem ID: 135765825) showed docking scores of -8.2 and -7.8 kcal/mol, respectively, compared with -6.6 kcal/mol for the comparative reference ligand (STD). Both compounds satisfied Lipinski's rule of five; however, their predicted ADMET profiles were mixed, including negative predictions for human intestinal absorption for both compounds and compound-specific metabolic and toxicity liabilities. The 300 ns MD trajectories indicated broadly stable CatK ligand complexes. TOP1 showed slightly lower mean RMSD)/RMSF values than TOP2. In contrast, TOP2 exhibited more favorable MM/PBSA binding free energies than TOP1 at both analyzed intervals (-83.45 ± 10.06 and -80.74 ± 10.18 kJ/mol for TOP2 versus -74.28 ± 10.08 and -57.21 ± 15.04 kJ/mol for TOP1), while STD showed the most favorable MM/PBSA binding free energies overall. Collectively, TOP1 and TOP2 exhibited complementary computational profiles and should therefore be regarded as candidates for biochemical and cellular validation rather than confirmed CatK inhibitors or orally suitable drug leads.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.