ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Ultratrace Osmium in Wild Mushrooms: Environmental Occurrence and Chemical-Form-Dependent Molecular and Toxicological Interpretation.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Osmium (Os) is an exceptionally scarce platinum-group element whose occurrence in terrestrial biota remains poorly characterised. This study investigated ultratrace Os occurrence in wild mushroom fruiting bodies collected from urban and rural green spaces in Leicester and Leicestershire, UK, as part of a broader environmental biomonitoring programme. An Os-specific analytical audit reconstructed 157 original analytical records into 121 fruiting-body biological units and evaluated occurrence using study-specific procedural-background and low-end calibration criteria. Under the primary analytical interpretation, 28/121 fruiting bodies (23.1%; exact 95% CI: 16.0-31.7%) produced Os-associated responses distinguishable from the operational background criterion, whereas 93/121 were classified as non-detects. Although no fruiting body reached the study-specific operational LLOQ, the occurrence pattern was informative: 58/59 directly comparable classifications were concordant under a stricter same-batch procedural-blank scenario, while broader sensitivity analyses demonstrated that classification at these ultratrace levels remains dependent on analytical-background definition. The findings provide evidence that Os-associated signals occur in wild fungi at extremely low analytical levels and empirically demonstrate how analytical-background definition constrains interpretation at the boundary between occurrence and quantification. Quantitative environmental, exposure and toxicological characterisation will require dedicated Os-specific methods with lower validated quantitative limits, explicit recovery control and preservation of chemical-speciation information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.