ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Personalized mRNA Neoantigen Vaccines in Cancer: Linking Precision Antigen Selection, Immune Remodeling, and Checkpoint Blockade.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Personalized mRNA neoantigen vaccines represent an emerging form of precision cancer immunotherapy designed to generate de novo T-cell responses against patient-specific tumor mutations. Their therapeutic activity, however, depends not only on neoantigen selection and vaccine-induced immune priming but also on whether these responses can remain functional within an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Immune checkpoint blockade provides a mechanistically complementary strategy by relieving inhibitory signaling that constrains vaccine-expanded tumor-reactive lymphocytes. This review examines this therapeutic interface across three interconnected levels: molecular neoantigen selection and mRNA vaccine design, vaccine-driven remodeling of antitumor T-cell immunity, and clinical integration with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade. Particular emphasis is placed on how neoantigen clonality, antigen presentation, tumor heterogeneity, and immune escape influence the translation of vaccine immunogenicity into clinical benefit. Current evidence is evaluated across melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, including randomized and ongoing trials of intismeran autogene, an individualized synthetic mRNA therapy encoding patient-specific neoantigens, and autogene cevumeran, an individualized uridine mRNA-lipoplex neoantigen vaccine. By integrating molecular vaccine design with tumor evolution, immune-contexture remodeling, and checkpoint sensitivity, this review identifies determinants that may distinguish successful immune priming from durable therapeutic efficacy and outlines priorities for biomarker-guided patient selection and future combination strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.