ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
New Facile Testing Protocols to Assess Conformability of Advanced Dressings for Wound Healing.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conformability of advanced dressings is a key parameter to evaluate their ability to adapt to the complex shape of the wound, which promotes its healing and prevents the formation of gaps at the wound interface, which, in turn, may favour microbial proliferation. However, conformability is normally measured by evaluating the mechanical properties of dressings and frequently under dry conditions, failing to evaluate the behaviour in clinical conditions, where the wound is normally characterized by large volumes of exudate. New methods are under study for its evaluation, but they generally require complex experimental procedures or specialized equipment. Here, we validate a simple and inexpensive method proposed for conformability characterization by testing its application to a variety of dressings, differing in composition and type of absorbing layer. We test the impact of different volumes of exudate-simulating solution and the impact of dressing size on the results. In addition, we implement the test by simultaneously evaluating other parameters (time of absorption, lateral spreading of the solution) that impact wound healing. Finally, we validate the test by demonstrating its capability to predict adaptability of complex wound shapes in specifically developed wound-mimicking models. Our results show that the test can be applied to all tested dressings, successfully highlighting differences in conformability and demonstrating high reproducibility. We demonstrate that conformability can largely vary between different dressings but is not affected by either dressing size or exudate volume, whereas lateral spreading and time of absorption can be significantly affected by both parameters. Finally, we demonstrate that the tests succeed in predicting adaptability to wounds of complex shape in tissue models; hence it is suitable for a simple and cost-effective measure of conformability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.